http://frenchphilo.tribe.net/thread/751837ef-c318-47d5-89e4-3147e2edb164?format=rss Tribe.net. Local Connections http://frenchphilo.tribe.net/thread/751837ef-c318-47d5-89e4-3147e2edb164#ee251b87-f133-4b2e-a447-2b4d9718f587 Any Pierre Hadot fans out there? Or Hadot-haters? I read his "What is Ancient Philosophy?" about 2 years ago and I found his approach to ancient philosophy to be extremely refreshing - especially compared to the ham-fisted anachronisms of the so-called "analytical" philosophers' approach to ancient philosophy. The three things that I most appreciate about that book in particular are: (1) Hadot's unitary vision of ancient philosophy as a single coherent phenomenon - so that the commonalities of the various "schools" is emphasized over their divisions. (2) Hadot's attention to late antique philosophy, especailly "neoplatonism". (3) I also really liked his treatment of Stoic philosophy, and so now I'm reading "The Inner Citadel". There's one other thing that I liked about the book, now that I think of it. Hadot presents a mostly implicit, but at the same time devastating, critique of Christianity's influence on the intellectual history of the West. One Christian reviewer, Benjamin Balint, even wrote a review of the book titled "What Christianity Did To Philosophy" - which was meant to be sarcastic. That review used to be available online directly from the magazine "First Things" where it was originally published - but now I think it's only available to subscribers. The bottom line is that Balint states that Hadot "confidently identifies Christianity as the agent of philosophy’s decline." Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:27:36 GMT http://frenchphilo.tribe.net/thread/751837ef-c318-47d5-89e4-3147e2edb164#ee251b87-f133-4b2e-a447-2b4d9718f587 Cornel 2007-02-02T17:27:36Z